Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> Received: from relay16.mail.aol.com (relay16.mail.aol.com [172.31.106.72]) by air11.mail.aol.com (v38.1) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 1998 12:15:19 -0500 Received: from majordomo.netcom.com (listless.netcom.com [206.217.29.105]) by relay16.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id MAA16215; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 12:15:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by majordomo.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.01)) id JAA07569; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 09:04:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 09:04:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> X-Sender: [log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask] From: [log in to unmask] (Esther Polito) Subject: photos X-Mailer: <Windows Eudora Version 2.0.2> Sender: [log in to unmask] Errors-To: [log in to unmask] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [log in to unmask] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I recall a brief discussion some time ago concerning cases in which the sale of historic building photos was restricted. As I remember, the original query was prompted by an objection raised by an institutional owner to the use of photos of its "signature" building in such a manner. Anyway, Arts Wire just reported a relevant Circuit Court of Appeals decision: PHOTOGRAPHER WINS COPYRIGHT SUIT BOUGHT BY ROCK HALL OF FAME CLEVELAND, OH-- On January 20, in The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame v. Gentile Productions, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a District Court injunction that not only forbade photographer Charles Gentile from using the museum's images in his posters but also ordered the posters destroyed. In its decision the Sixth Circuit Court stated that "...when we view the photograph in Gentile's poster, we do not readily recognize the design of the Museum's building as an indicator of source or sponsorship. What we see, rather, is a photograph of an accessible, well-known, public landmark......As we have noted, we find no support for the factual finding that the public recognizes the Museum's building design, in any form, let alone in all forms, as a trademark." "Words can hardly express my feelings of relief and thankfulness at the U.S.Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to vacate the preliminary injunction brought against me by the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum," Gentile told Arts Wire. "I know we have only won a battle, not a war, but this ruling represents a victory for every visual artists. It sends a clear message to businesses and institutions all over the world about the importance of our legal rights." In 1996, the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame & Museum sued Gentile for infringing its trademark by selling posters made from his photo of the Museum's I.M. Pei building. Gentile's sunset photo of the pyramid shaped museum against Lake Erie was captioned "ROCK N' ROLL HALL OF FAME". According to the text of the Circuit Court's decision, in 1996, the District Court found that the Museum's building design was a fanciful mark, and that Gentile's use of the Museum's building design and the words, "Rock N' Roll Hall of Fame", were likely to cause confusion. The District Court then ordered Gentile to refrain from further infringements of the Museum's trademarks and to "deliver . . . for destruction all copies of defendant's poster in their possession." "It's ironic that an institution that is supposed to be dedicated to freedom of artistic expression, the rock industry, tried to trample a young artist". Gentile quotes his attorney J.Michael Murray as saying in THE PLAIN DEALER. (January 21, 1998) In his appeal, Gentile argued that the district court abused its discretion when it concluded that the Museum had shown a likelihood of success on the merits for purposes of the preliminary injunction. Specifically, Gentile argued that his photograph of the Museum is not a trademark use of the Museum's building design. He also argued that his use of the words "ROCK N' ROLL HALL OF FAME", is a non-trademark use which simply and accurately describes his non-infringing photograph of the Museum. "When you have to face a federal court without a lawyer, as I did in the initial phase of the case you find out how important it is to belong to a really good trade association," Gentile told Arts Wire in response to a question about what the process was like. "Through the darkest hours of this nightmare, ASMP (The American Society of Media Photographers) was there for me with guidance, support and assistance. I wish to thank the ASMP board of directors for approving funds for an Amicus Curiae brief in the support of my case." He also stated that whatever the next phase of his legal battle brings, he knows that along with his attorney J. Michael Murray and his excellent legal team, he will have the backing of thousands of his ASMP colleagues. "We will continue to fight to preserve our Constitutional right of artistic expression, and to maintain our ability to make a viable livelihood as professional photographers," Gentile said. Sources: The full text of the decision of U.S.Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case No. 96-3759, ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM, INC. V. GENTILE PRODUCTIONS, is available at http://www.law.emory.edu/6circuit/jan98/98a0020p.06.html "Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Sues Photographer Over Building Image" Arts Wire CURRENT -- http://www/artswire.org/current/1966/cur062496.html June 24, 1996 ************************************************************** Esther Polito, Cultural Services Manager, City of Davis Parks and Community Services Department, 23 Russell Blvd., Davis California 95616 phone: (530)757-5626 fax: (530)758-0204 [log in to unmask]