Denis: >Those of you who are interested by the personality of Mr Comby can ask >Peter to put on the list those messages which, on behalf of my >ill-intentions vis a vis Comby, he deemed not objective . On the contrary, I would ask Peter _not_ to post any of your writing which he deemed inappropriate and say to Peter: THANK YOU for moderating. >I would not have written this message had not Peter naively considered >the lies of Comby as an expression of his "frankness". I have tried to >put up the case in a way that is as "unemotional", as "detached", i.e. as >"american", as is possible for me to do , taking into account how dear >these ideas are to my mind, and how sad I'm to realize that these ideas >hopefully hold much more positive prospects than the self declared >european leaders of this movement . Don't worry, Denis, no one takes every post as Truth (especially not yours I'd imagine). It appears to me that you may be a greater victim of GCB than you consider Mr. Cromby (or is Mr. Cromby simply wayward IYO?). Obsessing for seven years with finding obscure historical precedents for instincto as a way of doing in GCB seems beyond reason. One could ask you the same question Peter asked Bruno: if you knew so much, as you always seem to on every issue, why didn't you go to the authorities (instead of hiding in your love of history)? That's a rhetorical question. Cheers, Kirt