<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>> I have a husband with celiac. Because it is hereditary, we have read in Canadian celiac information that infants from a family with a history should be kept gluten free for a year or so. This way their bowel matures before they have gluten, and even if pre-disposed, their celiac may never develop. My question is now that we are putting the baby on regular food, if we notice syptoms, why shouldn't we just keep her gluten free, and never give it a second thought. She is 100% healthy otherwise, why put her thru a biopsy? So she's OFFICIALLY DIAGNOSED? For what purpose? Unlike the IRS, Revenue Canada won't let us claim food expenses. Any opinions? Thanks. Susan.