It wasn't that highly rated as I understand it from my friends. Barb K1EIR -----Original Message----- From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Dresser Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:16 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: off topic I've heard that even Microsoft admits it isn't as good as it was cracked up to be, but I don't know why that's the case. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:01 Subject: Re: off topic > Microsoft security essentials is a lot better than you might think unless > that's changed in the last 6 months or so. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 11:29 AM > Subject: off topic > > >> Yesterday avast updated its program and deffinitions. Now it thinks that >> any form of system access is so suspicious that it shuts down your >> computer. >> It also doesn't like text cloaner. Consiquently, I no longer like avast. >> The program interface has become innaccessible, even with jaws. So >> besides >> micrsoft security essentials, which is very weak, does anybody have a >> recommendation for a free anti--virus program that is both strong and >> excessible? >> >> I hear for purchase, nod-32 is good. >> >> H T Kaufman MSW LCSW >> Adaptive Technology Instructor >> >> >> --- >> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus >> protection is active. >> http://www.avast.com >