on the same logic then, aprc above udp....

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013, UDP United Kingdom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Cherno, maybe you should add; 'except votes'. That is the barometer for everything political.
>
> Thanks
> Daffeh
>
> On Wednesday, 29 May 2013, C. Omar Kebbeh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Guys,
>> Slow down. PDOIS is the finest opposition party in the Gambia. It was a mistake that they failed to attend Raleigh. In the same regard, I think they are still above UDP, NRP and others, in all senses. 
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, abdoukarim sanneh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Demba
>> Lot more are giving him an easy ride and I cannot take the continuum of thid utopian idological framing without universal foundation but build within illusive PDOIS THEOREM OF DEMOCRACTIC democratic fundamentalism where individualism and his domination of theorem shade the central political agenda. It is deeply sickening and the political manufacturing will continue.
>>  
>> ________________________________
>> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:59:59 -0700
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Halifa's opinion on DA Jawo....A sad calculus
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> LJD,
>> Thanks for clarifying that... in fact in my interview with the organizers of the London conference they clearly stated their conference was only meant to bring the groups in London together. Matter of fact it was put together on short notice while the Raleigh conference is being planned for several months.
>> The fact remains that Halifa's explanation of not attending is an attempt to justify him and his party's failure to answer to a call to dialogue. We have traveled this route before over and over... When a conference was organized in Atlanta in July 2007 in which Halifa was in attendance he advanced the same agenda; that the conference was putting the cart before the horse... that it was premature to organize such a conference in the Diaspora without coming to an agreement... 
>> This time around again, he excuses for PDOIS's failure to attend are just that excuses. How do you expect to come to a consensus without meeting? How do you expect a constituents as large as the Diaspora to come to a consensus before organizing a meeting for all constituents?
>> Is Halifa telling us that CONSENSUS is a precondition for him and PDOIS to attend a future conference in Norway or Sweden, Senegal or London? He he insinuating that the Diaspora must have a consensus on what? before they can organize a conference?
>> Is he insinuating that DA Jawo is politically inactive and as a result he doesn't have an opinion or say on what has transpired?
>> Gambians are witnessing the same repeated feet dragging by Halifa and PDOIS... Anything they don't seems to originate they don't want to be a part of... This is worrisome and counter productive...
>> This time around we will not sit idle and let these perfectionist leaders derail our efforts to bring the constituents together to discuss national issues... That is the call... bring people together without conditions to discuss the way forward for Gambia. What is not clear about that? What consensus do we need to organize a meeting.... 
>> We openly invite Halifa and Co to come to these conferences, to the airways away from their comfort zones of Foroyaa and PDOIS central committee to discuss matters with the country. Why are they afraid to face other constituents? Why are they worried about the arguments and the disagreements to be discussed openly... Are they more worried about their image than the future of the country? 
>> Let's hear from them directly...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Demba
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kejau Touray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Mbading, 
>> Very funny! Do not mind my good old friend, Karim! Well DA's political innocence is the only explanation for his naivety otherwise he must be deliberately misleading his audiences by stating that: 
>> 1. That PDOIS stance was vague and at the same time writing that PDOIS' stance has merits. How does a vague stance gets merited.? 
>> 2. By declaring that there was a resolution that all should support even though he seem to be only one talking about such resolution and that was the distinguished Halifa's point. So believe me, Halifa was very nice and diplomatic as usual and calling a dishonest and insincere editor as naive. 
>> Otherwise, do you not think Halifa has a good point about not attending as the attendance bred more problems between the parties than they were ab initio? Thes ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>

> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤