Oh, ok! Sent from Anthony Vece's Verizon iPhone On Mar 15, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Martin McCormick <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > That's the elder Bush. Bush41. > Steve Dresser writes: >> Anthony, >> >> I thought you knew: Bush caused that earthquake to get back at the >> Japanese >> for the time he got sick at one of their banquets. >> >> Steve >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]> >> To: <[log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 18:51 >> Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax >> >> >>> If they could blame him for the latest earthquake in Japan, they would! >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from Anthony Vece's Verizon iPhone >>> >>> On Mar 14, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Ed Malmgren <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> Steve, some will never get over blaming Bush for everything Which went >>>> goo= >>> d=20 >>>> or bad. >>>> Ed K7UC >>>> ----- Original Message -----=20 >>>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]> >>>> To: <[log in to unmask]> >>>> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:12 AM >>>> Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax >>>> =20 >>>> =20 >>>>> Actually, I think Richard Nixon was the first one to tout it as >>>>> something= >>> >>>>> that would conserve energy. >>>>> =20 >>>>> Steve >>>>> =20 >>>>> ----- Original Message -----=20 >>>>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 21:30 >>>>> Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax >>>>> =20 >>>>> =20 >>>>>> because Bush probably believed it was true lol. >>>>>> As I remember it, GW Bush was the first to market it as energy saving >>>>>> or= >>> >>>>>> some such garbage. >>>>>> 73 >>>>>> Colin, V A6BKX >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=20 >>>>>> From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]> >>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]> >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 6:28 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: daylight saving hoax >>>>>> =20 >>>>>> =20 >>>>>>> If the 24 world wide time zones were good enough for an >> international >>>>>>> treaty >>>>>>> then they are good enough now. And I do think DST was started >> during >>>>>>> World >>>>>>> War Ii because it was originally called war time. But like Steve >>>>>>> said,= >>> >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> not an energy saver, so why falsely market it as such? >>>>>>> Harvey >>>>>> =20 >>>>> =20 >>> >> >>