So the quote  
"Sound conservation practice demands that we remove all risks" 
may apply here    only in more ways than meet the eye ...?py
 
That quote really hit home during an interesting discussion with a professional conservator involving "Fear of Peers", the elimination of all risk being the heart of the fear.   It involved a question about a material treatment choice on a material the conservator was not specifically specifically trained in although being a highly respected member of the conservator profession in areas extremely extremely closely related.   The issue revolved around a decision about which treatment of two was the preferred, or if both could be used appropriately depending on the various skill levels of the people to be trained to help carry out the task.   The differing end results were so subtle that, to my eye, only highly highly trained professionals would be able to catch the difference, and both treatments were said to be acceptable in terms of professional material conservation practice.  The problem that emerged was deciding if anyone else might think one was better, or if it mattered at all.
 
The risk for the individual was that some other more specifically qualified conservator might criticize the decision and therefore the individual's professional competency and reputation.   So, the decision was to be left entirely to someone else, so that the conservator would not be at risk of being "wrong".   Whoever was to make the decision would carry the possibility of "blame".  The personal ethics of perfectionism have become entwined with peer judgment.
 
The fear of peer criticism was as powerful as if an ethical structural engineer was asked to do a building design layout, or an architect asked to design a beam.   There are professional agreements and laws that define those particular limits of work and responsibility, but in a trade such as conservation, there is only peer pressure and peer fear as opposed to the legal liabilities and professional turf agreements between engineering or architecture.  
 
"Failure is the modern taboo." said Richard Sennett in his book "Corrosion of Character", and he had it right!
 
 
Trustingly,
c in elsewhere,
 
(please keep this to this List, and Do Not Cross-Post for fear of offending the unknown)-----(or can one truly fear the unknown, and is that just a convenient mental camouflage for what is truly known)
 

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html