The shock for me (Canadian) is that this came from Canada where funds for all sorts of cultural and historic places and programs are currently being disastrously cut and eliminated.   We will soon be thinking of the historic buildings as sources of firewood to keep us warm during the winter, and the government will probably ask us to thank them for providing us with a little extra costly warmth due to the epoxy treatments.
 
The awful irony is that I am currently in the midst of a major artefact cleaning and conservation project due to a recent fire in the historic Farmhouse I work with.   The image of deeply charred wood at the closet and hall door frames where the fire happened is terribly familiar as a daily sight and smell along with local self-appointed "experts" with strong opinions about the desirability of consolidating the charred remains of door frames due to the simplistic fact that they were made 150 years ago.   The original highly skilled carpenter would have no question about what to do with the charred mess.
 
cp in bc
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [BP] Our Incredibly Precious Material Heritage, Chapitre CXXVIII

Until all the toxic resins were applied it probably would have provided a good warm fire.

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html