The ramble is extremely valuable, appropriate, and visionary. And I read
every word of it.

Ginny I'll give you a hint:
Your fair review of all political parties and their leaders of Gambia IS
NOT WHAT BRINGS OUT THE DAGGERS. I just want you to know that.

Some time just after the nadd dissolution and UDP/NRP's withdrawal from the
 gaucherie, The GDP had invited UDP and NRP officials in order to fashion a
 reconvening of minds around some coalescing of forces. You were kind
enough to  grace a meeting of Hon. Hamat Bah. You spoke gloriously of him and he
spoke  admirably of you both here and in Gambia. On your blog, there is
publication  dedicated to Hamat, the Man.

So in life's mirages, and being an enhanced human being, you will not
understand why you solicit venom from some corners, even as you give praise to
their dear leader. The mentality and level of development is such that not
only  is disagreement a harbinger of derision and contemptuous libel, but so
is the  commendation and "praise" of phantom enemies.

I hope this keeps things in better perspective for you. I am concerned that
 you will blame yourself for your good self. And it has nothing (virtually
nothing) to do with Ginny. What it risks doing is intimidating you to a
point  where you recede in human terms to meet your detractors at the lower ebb
of  life. I advise you stay true north. And enjoy life with your trademark
considerations.
Haruna.


In a message dated 4/16/2009 10:21:38 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

I wasn't  necessarily saying that anyone said, word for word, that
Halifa Sallah  wasn't human.  And wasn't prone to mistakes.  I merely
pointed  that fact out, as an aside, because every time Halifa Sallah
is discussed,  and/or criticized in anyway, the claws come out.  And I
mean every  time!  I almost guarantee you that if you scream Halifa
Sallah on a  crowded list, it's bound to evoke some kinda response.
And I also think  that some of his supporters idolize him, put him on a
pedestal, darn near  worship him, and anyone can disagree with me on
this point if you want,  however, from what I've seen, anyone who
criticizes him (rightly or  wrongly), gets all kinds of stuff flung at
them, and we get the same old  tired lecture of how great he is for The
Gambia, and how much he's done for  the Gambian people.  Which may or
may not be true, that's not even the  point I'm addressing.  However,
the unspoken rule seems to be that  criticism of Halifa Sallah is off
limits.  Now this may, or may not,  be true.  Maybe he has, or can't do
anything wrong.  Maybe the  criticism has taken place off list.  I
don't know.

I'll say  (once again as this seems to be getting lost in the shuffle),
that I  commend Halifa Sallah for speaking out and doing what he could
to get at  the truth of what actually took place.  And I think that
questioning  his motives, just for the sake of questioning them,
without any proof to  substantiate any of the claims made in
questioning his motives, is wrong  and is over the top.  OK?  Now, if
anyone has any substantiated  claims that Sallah was acting in his own
self-interest, or for his own  political gains, let's post hard facts
here, and not just mere speculation  and inuendo.  Let's not disagree
with Halifa Sallah just for the sake  of disagreeing with him.

I have wondered, though, why Halifa Sallah and  the PDOIS party has
failed to gain traction with the Gambian people.   And when I've asked
this question, the inference I get is that the Gambian  people, by and
large, are not politically mature enough, not educated  enough, and are
too tribalistic in their mindset, to choose what's best for  them (read
Sallah).  Now, if one thinks so low of the people they  supposedly are
trying to fight for, the people you supposedly want to have  freedom,
democracy, the rule of law, etc., doesn't that mean that they  should
be allowed to support the candidate of their choosing?  Even if  it's
not Sallah?  Is Sallah (and the other opposition politicians as  well)
fighting for the Gambian people, or are they fighting for their  own
political gains?  And if Sallah is so different than the  other
opposition politicians, how so?  What has he done that say,  Darboe (a
human rights lawyer mind you) hasn't?

Sallah might be the  best thing for The Gambia (I'll steer away from
the "sliced bread"  comparison as it might offend some), however, the
hard fact is that the  majority of Gambians do *not* support him!  Now,
how can you get  support from people when you infer (or right out say)
that the constituency  that you're asking to vote for you is too stupid
and uneducated to do  so?  Now Sallah may not have said this himself,
but I've heard/seen it  from his supporters enough...  And I'd
personally not support someone  who insults my intelligence or thinks
me stupid.

It seems that all  of the opposition leaders' supporters aren't that
much different than  Jammeh's supporters.  You criticize their leaders,
the claws will come  out, you'll get called all kinds of names, and be
asked to prove (with  supporting messages, footnotes, and
documentation) every letter, word,  sentence, that you utter.  And in
the process of the back-and-forth,  we lose sight of what the actual
goal is.  Perhaps if we remember what  the ultimate goal is, which is
to restore democracy and the rule of law to  The Gambia (or at least
that's what I thought it was), then we can put our  differences aside
to achieve that goal and then worry about the back and  forth bickering
later.  However, it seems that you have a group of  people who would
rather have Jammeh in power, than to see anyone else  butHalifa Sallah
as the next President of The Gambia.

All of the  opposition leaders, imho, have done something, in their own
way, to  challenge the current regime in power.  They'd not be
opposition  leaders if they had not done something...  Maybe it wasn't
exactly  what Sallah was or is doing, but if it's not, does it mean
that how they  choose to stand up to the dictatorship is necessarily
"wrong", or that  because they're not acting as PDOIS/Sallah woudl act,
that that makes them  power hungry, selfish, etc.?

And this is why we can't unite!   Because some do not have respect for
the parties they don't agree with,  they've put Sallah way up here, and
the rest of the opposition leaders way  down here.  And will come on
the list and say they want a united  opposition no matter what, while
trashing some of the opposition  candidates.

I'm going to use American politics as an example again (and  my
apologies as this seems to offend some too), but do you think  Obama
would have gotten elected if he trashed Hillary and her  supporters
after he'd won the primary?  Or, vice versa, i.e., what if  Hillary
and/or her supporters had continued trashing Obama after he'd won,  and
the democratic party had remained divided?  What I'm trying to say  is
that for the most part, even Democrats and Independents, for  that
matter, rallied around Obama even if they didn't necessarily  agree
with him, in order to get rid of Bush and not allow McCain to  get
elected.  They were able to put their smaller differences aside  and
focus on the bigger goal of ousting the Republicans from the  White
House as well as from many seats in Congress.

Now, if people  can't even do that here on this list, when we're
supposedly dealing with  mature and educated people, how do we expect
the leaders to be able to do  it?  And even if the leaders were able to
come together, what about  their supporters?

You've got one person rehashing an event that  happened in 1996, per
Darboe, and another person questioning the supposed  ulterior motives
of a guy who, for whatever reason, put his life on the  line for asking
questions...  i.e. Sallah...  And this is just a  waste of time and
we're losing site of the big picture here!

My  nuanced view, that many either missed or chose to only focus on  the
critical of Sallah parts, is that Sallah stood up and spoke  out
*more*, hear me?  I said *more than* any of the other leaders that  we
knew of!  I was commending him for this.  However, based not  only on
this current conversation but past exchanges regarding  Sallah,
criticism of him is not tolerated, even if it may be  warranted!  I
also said that Sallah has done a lot in educating the  people in
electoral matters (and that was missed too), however, the fact  still
remains that PDOIS is still a small party in The Gambia.  And  the fact
also is that many say that he and PDOIS urged people to support  an
admittedly flawed Constitution, the reason being that a  flawed
Constitution coudl be changed later and it was better than  no
Constitution at all.  However, that's pretty much water under  the
bridge (just as Darboe's seeking refuge with the Senegalese  embassy
should also be water under the bridge), because even if we would  have
had a perfect Constitution, Jammeh has all but ruined it, and if  the
Freedom Newspaper *shudder* is accurate, Jammeh's fixing to  *oops,
there's the Tennessee coming out* put up a bill making The Gambia  a
one-party state.  What will the opposition do then?  Where will  the
endless quoting of the Constitution get anyone then?

You see,  many times I tend to have a pretty nuanced opinion about
things.  And  many I think, missed that.

Anyway...  this old argument regarding  Sallah/the opposition, in
general, is an old and tired one, and I'm sorry  that I wasted my time,
and others' time, getting involved in  it.

Although the emotional quips of "going back to Clarksville and  telling
the hibbies" along with my supposedly thinking my opinions superior  to
others (but they were didn't ya know?  'cause I'm educated and  all
that) have kept me laughing all day...  And such an emotional  reaction
from presumably PDOIS/Sallah supporters have proven my point, that  any
kind of disagreement, or even mere suggestion that perhaps  something
else different should be tried, can't be tolerated, unless of  course,
the great and wonderful Sallah says it should be so...  And  Maybe
Sallah is a great and wonderful leader, and I'm just not seeing  it.

I've just not been the type to put people on pedestals.  Even  Obama,
who I think, for the most part, is doing good for this country,  I
don't always agree with.

Anyway, I've rambled on long  enough...

Ginny



On 4/16/09, Jabou Joh  <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ginny,
>
> Where in the  responses of those who are challenging the misinformation
about
>  Halifa's intentions or anything else that is said about him for that 
matter,
> have you read where any of us have even suggested that Halifa  is not
human
> and does not make mistakes?
> Jabou  Joh
>
> But last I checked, he was human just like the rest of us,  he's not
perfect,
> and just like the other opposition leaders (who by  being opposition
leaders
> and human rights lawyers, etc., have also put  their lives on the line for
> The Gambia), have also made  mistakes.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>  From: Ginny Quick <[log in to unmask]>
> To:  [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:01 am
>  Subject: Re: The Halifa Factor, what next?
>
>
>
> You  know, I could care less *why* Halifa did what he did!  If others
want  to
> question his motives than go right ahead...  However, the fact  of the
matter
> remains that he went on a fact-finding mission  regarding the
"witch-hunts",
> was arrested for it, and had charges  brought against him!  Where were the
> other politicians while  all of this was going on?  He was the most
outspoken
> out of all  of the opposition politicians.
>
>
>
> Having said  that, though, just like the Republicans and Democrats in this
> country  can't do anything right in the other's eyes, so goes with the
> various  opposition parties (and their supporters) in The Gambia.  If it
had
> been Ousainou Darbo or someone else, then someone would probably  be
coming
> along and questioning Ousainou's motives
>   too.
>
>
>
> I don't think that anyone in PDOIS is any  more or less prone to hero
worship
> than a supporter from any other  party, but I've always detected a hint
of, I
> can't find the right word  for it, but a hint of defensiveness and and a
> sorta cult-like  hero-worship where Halifa is concerned, though this
> definitely  doesn't hold true for every PDOIS supporter.  And Halifa is
>  human, prone to error, just like anyone else, though if you listen to
some
> people talk, he's the best thing since sliced bread, and if you  don't
> support him, then there's something wrong with you, you're  stupid,
> uneducated, or any number of  invectives.
>
>
>
> Notwithstanding all of this, at  least in the most recent case of
> witch-hunting, no matter why Halifa  did what he did, he did it!  And if
> anyone wants to  question Halifa's motives for doing so, I'd like a little
> more  than speculation, i.e., direct quotes, hard evidence, etc., for
>  example, to sit there and say "if Halifa knew he'd be arrested, he'd  not
> have done what he did".  Which doesn't make sense to me  because if memory
> serves me, Halifa has been detained before, so  surely he knew that his
> actions could well land him in detention of  some sort.
>
>
>
> Anyway, I've only read through some  of the posts as the back-and-forth
was
> giving me a headache.  And  it's just the same old "Halifa is
selfish/thinks
> we're  stupid/whatever" meme against Halifa, and the "Halifa is great and
>  wonderful and how dare you question him/we all k
> now what you're  trying to do/you're trying to tarnish the image of the
most
> courageous  Gambian to ever walk the face of the earth/what you're saying
> about  Halifa is patently untrue", on the other side.
>
>
>
>  And from my vantage point, the true is probably somewhere in the middle
of
> those two extremes.  Halifa hs done much to educate Gambians,  has done
much
> to empower them electorally, and he has put his life on  the line to
stand up
> for Gambians.  But last I checked, he was  human just like the rest of us,
> he's not perfect, and just like the  other opposition leaders (who by
being
> opposition leaders and human  rights lawyers, etc., have also put their
lives
> on the line for The  Gambia), have also made mistakes.
>
>
>
>  Ginny
>
>
>
>
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>  unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web
> interface at:  http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
> To Search in the  Gambia-L archives, go to:
>  http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact
the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>  [log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>
>
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> To  unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
>  Web interface
> at:  http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
> To Search in  the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>  http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
> To contact  the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>  [log in to unmask]
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To  unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web  interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To  Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the  List Management, please send an e-mail  to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

**************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤