John Leeke wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">>>Some time back I mentioned the giant steam box, 5' x 10' inside capacity<<

Wow, that's gotta be the momma of all steam boxes.
Blame it on Duffy who had big dreams and a heart behind that.
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">(can you climb in there and take a steam bath at the end of the day?)
Who needs to climb in?
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">What are you using to generate steam for that? How many watts of electricity does it use?
Two steam room generators. I will check the wattage. They are rated 240V running at 208V. Works fine on the lower voltage just takes longer to get it in flow. As yet we have no data on power consumption and/or power cost.
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">We are using the baby (4' x 5') foam board steam box
I made one of those from plans from your buddy. It has practical applications. Used it on a set of windows for the B from Westchester. The big box is a whole different reality.

Love the salvage of glass, tho.
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">, light-weight, highly portable, or make one up at each job site for $50 materials and 3 hours labor--powered by a 1500-2500 watt steam unit. Sash steam times are 15-20 minutes at box temps of 203 to 210 (sea level, still want to try it in Denver!) We improve through-put efficiency by 15-20% operating the box in a vertical position, sash sliding in and out vertically.
Interesting idea but will have to think hard on figuring out how to get the monster to do vertical. I best express it as a PIZZA oven.
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">Condensate drains off sash, wood damage is much less due to less liquid water soaking into wood. Recent improvements keep the steam in the box when sash are taken in and out. (at least 10% through-put increase, we expected better, but have done just one run so far) Glass breakage down by 10-12% compared to any dry-heat deglazing method.
We are not as yet sophisticated on feedback, mostly focused on brute DO IT technologies. We are taking the Thomas Edison approach as opposed to the Tesla one.
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">>>Hot in the  room though<<

We had to set up sash-steam operations in a collections exhibition area at the American Precision Museum in Vermont, where the steam may have condensed on the antique machinery. I set up RH & temp monitoring of air with dataloggers. We rigged the steam box for the steam to vent directly out doors. (and wondered if there is ever lead in the steam effluent, do you know if anyone has tested the method for that risk?)
I am not aware of any testing on that -- if not you then who? -- thought about it, but very highly doubt it occurs at all. Do we need an MIT person on that. Environment obviously conditions the process. I had dreams of doing on-site work on a cornice in Garden City w/ a production line of steam boxes custom built... but the owner freaked for whatever reason. Maybe I should give her your name. I liked her but I don't think she was quite clued in to how far her house had been neglected.

I will talk w/ you at the IPTW on this technology. I would like to collaborate.

][<en
--
Orgrease-Crankbait Video, audio, writings, words, spoken word, dialogs, graphic collage and the art of fiction in language and literature.

-- To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html