-------------- Original message --------------
From: Kathy Du Bois <[log in to unmask]>

> Sorry, Phil,
> I won't vote for McCain because we disagree on too many issues. I'm
> getting to the point where I need to stay true to my principles
> instead of lending my name to a man that I will never trust. I have
> similar problems with Huckabee. Just because the guy is an ordained
> minister doesn't mean that I agree with him, and on many things, I
> just don't. I know that I'm setting myself up to be mighty lonely,
> but I've held my nose and voted for too many people for the sake of
> party unity and I just can't do it any more. Besides, I've gotten
> nowhere with my compromise and I'm tired of acting the
> sucker. There's really no difference between McCain and Hilary,
> though I must admit that if Obama is our next president, and that is
> looking more likely every day, that slippery slope that Vinny
> mentioned will become a drop off. We have done this to ourselves and
> our children are paying the price.
> Oh, come quickly please, Lord Jesus!
> Kathy
>
>
>
>
> At 05:23 PM 2/11/2008, you wrote:
> >Kathy,
> >
> >It does make things mighty difficult this voting go around but if Mac picks
> >Huck for a VP, that would help but I don't think Mac is going to do that
> >regardless of who James Dobson says he is backing.
> >
> >Phil.
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:59 PM
> >Subject: Re: Christian Politics
> >
> >
> > > Hey Phil,
> > > Sorry, I've been gone for a few days, but this announcement makes me
> > > sick and angry all at the same time. I already said once on this
> > > list that I appreciate James Dobson, but I don't drink the kool
> > > ade. Well, I'll take a pass on this one for sure. I'm actually
> > > considering sitting out this election. I haven't done so since 1980,
> > > but I am not going to go through meaningless behaviors for some party
> > > that doesn't give a rip about doing what's right. And, just so there
> > > is no confusion, please notice that I didn't name a party. That's
> > > because I believe that both major parties are guilty as charged!
> > > Kathy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 10:32 PM 2/8/2008, you wrote:
> > > >I have been wondering when this would h appen and this morning I heard it
> >on
> > > >our local Denver news. Dr. James Dobson announced he is now backing Mike
> > > >Huckabee. Now you know, and I know, the Mike Huckabee isn't going to
> >even
> > > >get close to the White House unless, of course, Mac realizes that the
> > > >Christian evangelicals, so called, are going to back him if he pick Mike
> > > >Huckabee to be his VP? And you thought Christians weren't that involved
> >in
> > > >politics. Dobson said a couple of months ago that he would not, I
> >repeat,
> > > >he would not back Mit Romny, or was it big Mac? I forget who just now.
> > > >Maybe he said Rudy. It makes no difference. Oh, really? Since when has
> > > >any major Christian leader ever come out and announce publicly that he
> > > >wasn't going to vote for a candidate? They might say for whom they will
> > > >vote, after a fashion, but not for whom they will not vote as far as
> >picking
> > > >a conservative for the office. So, now you know how to vote as a
> >Christian.
> > > >
> > > >Phil.
> > >
> > >
>