I would, but in fact I don't.? And it seemed?very strange that this information evidently isn't more readily available from a different, (even) more reliable,?and more concise?source than the Pinheads.

Ralph


-
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 9:25 am
Subject: Re: [BP] Py on the Pan Am building 9/11 - exact path of the aircraft over Man...




In a message dated 7/30/2007 9:14:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask] writes:

I would think information about the flight paths would have been reported-on extensively (both in the papers at the time and most conclusively in the 9/11 report).


You would think that, wouldn't you??? And then, necessarily, you would think that I am some kind of idiot, who hadn't - despite indicating that this was a subject of long-term interest - to even check the newspapers at the time or even now, in retrospect, and spent only?about? 1.5 minutes "researching" something until he gave up and bothered an entire listserv with the question.? ?That's what you would think.?? c

?

?




Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
-- To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html 

________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>