In a message dated 12/14/2006 2:46:26 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Wow,  incredibly prescient re: the damage of repeated intervention and 
the  desire to maintain the natural weathering as a portion of the 
architect's  aesthetic. Nice.




I kinda doubt he woulda been as happy if he'd seen the condition of  the 
stone 60 years after he said it shouldn't be cleaned.  It's not an  easy call, 
either way.
 
Ralph

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>