On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:31:55 -0700, Thomas E. Billings <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/6301583.htm
>
>Tom Billings

The title of the article shows prejudice against raw food. The fact that the
baby's diet was raw food is assumed to be the cause of the baby's
starvation. The implication is that cooked food would be okay. But the truth
is that a baby needs enzymes and hormones that are not in anything except
milk. Cooking the food would not have helped.