On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:31:55 -0700, Thomas E. Billings <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/6301583.htm > >Tom Billings The title of the article shows prejudice against raw food. The fact that the baby's diet was raw food is assumed to be the cause of the baby's starvation. The implication is that cooked food would be okay. But the truth is that a baby needs enzymes and hormones that are not in anything except milk. Cooking the food would not have helped.