In a message dated 9/13/2002 2:04:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> I wonder why the "Seekircher approach" will not work. Are they too far gone?

Eric,

Thanks for the information on Traco and EFCO. Since this is a tax credit
project, we are painfully aware of the change in profiles and have been
working to find the right replacements for about 6 months now. I will check
into the sources you mentioned.

The issue as far as rehab of the existing is a complex one for the client,
who is converting a factory to residential units. Existing units have
horizontally pivoting sashes, some 5 ft wide; original glazing was
transluscent wireglass, many units of which are broken or missing. In one
section of the building (masonry with heavy timber framing), the lintel has
deflected, causing breaks in the the concrete sill at the mullions and bowing
out of wall under the units. They have a lot of work to do!

However, many of the negatives have to do with the needs of the residential
vs industrial use, i.e.,  accessible window operation (the operable sashes
are quite high off the floor), safe operation (the steel sashes, although
well-balanced on the pivot pin, are extremely heavy, are operated manually,
and have potential of crushing fingers if operated too energetically); energy
efficiency, and need for interior screens being among the most compelling.
Although the existing sashes might be made operable, the other factors
mitigate against using them.

Any ideas?

Mary


_________________________________
Mary Delaney Krugman Associates, Inc.
Historic Preservation Consultants
36 Park Street
Montclair, New Jersey 07042
(973) 746-2810 V
(973) 746-2599 F