Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> Received: from rly-xc03.mx.aol.com (rly-xc03.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.136]) by air-xc03.mail.aol.com (v88.20) with ESMTP id MAILINXC34-0930082057; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:20:57 -0400 Received: from dont.panix.com (dont.panix.com [166.84.0.211]) by rly-xc03.mx.aol.com (v88.20) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXC34-0930082027; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:20:27 2000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by dont.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixLC1.7) id IAA03918 for preserve-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:20:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by dont.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixLC1.7) with ESMTP id IAA03913 for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:20:08 -0400 (EDT) From: [log in to unmask] Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com (imo-d04.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.36]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843764891A for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:20:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [log in to unmask] by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id 5.19e.99f0599 (3890) for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:19:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:19:57 EDT Subject: Re: Last One Standing To: [log in to unmask] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_19e.99f0599.2ac99b6d_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10582 Sender: [log in to unmask] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [log in to unmask] --part1_19e.99f0599.2ac99b6d_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As far as I saw in the testimonies and paperwork we picked up, not a single historic preservationist provided any information for the hearings regarding the destruction of the 1894 Whittier School and the vintage houses behind it. I know several of them care about the school and the negative changes that will occur all around it when torn down, so am not sure what happened. Three people testified in person, 6 others sent in testimony. In the development approval papers the city only recorded 3 parties of record. The oak tree they are going to kill for the parking garage entrance is magnificent. The developers have been harassing the old woman across the street to force her to sell to them. All those headlights are designed to shine into her house, the developers smirking that she won't be there much longer. You can bet the P & Z Commissioners wouldn't have allowed this to happen to themselves or to their family members. The highway district slipped their hearing on the issue past us, didn't even do a staff report, just approved the destruction without considering the fact that these streets are already over traffic capacity - or even that they are in a national historic district and a local conservation district. Our city hall is full of developer's reps, as is the highway district. Lots of talk of payola in this city. Too much money with this massive growth rate. There was a recent citizens' effort to dissolve the highway district, but they called in favors with the big money development pacs and everyone was scared off before the public hearing. Only one couple on the petition even showed up to testify, against a roomful of big name developers. It was a party atmosphere when it should have been treated as serious business, but apparently they were celebrating the decision before it was official. I wasn't part of the petition, didn't know about it until it hit the news, but still received several threatening attacks to keep me away. This is the environment in this city for most people trying to protect community quality or even try to get them to follow the comprehensive plan and adopted policies. Lots of scared people, which is why the hearings are so poorly attended. They've scheduled the hearing for the second block of destruction for this Wednesday - at noon - so very few people can attend. I don't think the media has even published a date for that hearing, or listed any of the issues. The neighborhood association recently got creamed in court by the City, on yet another approval based on broken agreements, so they haven't even sent out notices to the neighborhood about the hearing dates or issues. The Cathedral of the Rockies church is the developer, with several of our officials as members. A shining example of 'do unto others', along with community and family values. --part1_19e.99f0599.2ac99b6d_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>As far as I saw in the testimonies and paperwork we picked up, not a single historic preservationist provided any information for the hearings regarding the destruction of the 1894 Whittier School and the vintage houses behind it. I know several of them care about the school and the negative changes that will occur all around it when torn down, so am not sure what happened. Three people testified in person, 6 others sent in testimony. In the development approval papers the city only recorded 3 parties of record. <BR> <BR>The oak tree they are going to kill for the parking garage entrance is magnificent. The developers have been harassing the old woman across the street to force her to sell to them. All those headlights are designed to shine into her house, the developers smirking that she won't be there much longer. You can bet the P & Z Commissioners wouldn't have allowed this to happen to themselves or to their family members. <BR> <BR>The highway district slipped their hearing on the issue past us, didn't even do a staff report, just approved the destruction without considering the fact that these streets are already over traffic capacity - or even that they are in a national historic district and a local conservation district. Our city hall is full of developer's reps, as is the highway district. Lots of talk of payola in this city. Too much money with this massive growth rate. <BR> <BR>There was a recent citizens' effort to dissolve the highway district, but they called in favors with the big money development pacs and everyone was scared off before the public hearing. Only one couple on the petition even showed up to testify, against a roomful of big name developers. It was a party atmosphere when it should have been treated as serious business, but apparently they were celebrating the decision before it was official. I wasn't part of the petition, didn't know about it until it hit the news, but still received several threatening attacks to keep me away. This is the environment in this city for most people trying to protect community quality or even try to get them to follow the comprehensive plan and adopted policies. Lots of scared people, which is why the hearings are so poorly attended. <BR> <BR>They've scheduled the hearing for the second block of destruction for this Wednesday - at noon - so very few people can attend. I don't think the media has even published a date for that hearing, or listed any of the issues. The neighborhood association recently got creamed in court by the City, on yet another approval based on broken agreements, so they haven't even sent out notices to the neighborhood about the hearing dates or issues. The Cathedral of the Rockies church is the developer, with several of our officials as members. A shining example of 'do unto others', along with community and family values. <BR> <BR></FONT></HTML> --part1_19e.99f0599.2ac99b6d_boundary--