Return-Path: <>
Received: from rly-xg03.mx.aol.com (rly-xg03.mail.aol.com [172.20.115.200]) by air-xg02.mail.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILINXG22-0820155900; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:00 -0400
Received: from imo-r03.mx.aol.com (imo-r03.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.99]) by rly-xg03.mx.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXG36-0820155839; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:58:39 2000
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/AOL-5.0.0)
with internal id PAA26889;
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: earthlink.net|: host not found)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="PAA26889.1029873549/imo-r03.mx.aol.com"
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
--PAA26889.1029873549/imo-r03.mx.aol.com
The original message was received at Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
from root@localhost
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[log in to unmask]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <[log in to unmask]>... Host unknown (Name server: earthlink.net|: host not found)
--PAA26889.1029873549/imo-r03.mx.aol.com
Reporting-MTA: dns; imo-r03.mx.aol.com
Arrival-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [log in to unmask]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; earthlink.net|
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:08 -0400 (EDT)
--PAA26889.1029873549/imo-r03.mx.aol.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from [log in to unmask]
by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v33.5.) id v.18f.cc11aae (15898);
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from aol.com (mow-m09.webmail.aol.com [64.12.184.137]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILINID91-0820155903; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:03 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:59:03 -0400
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask] ("S. Sasser")
Subject: Re: BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Indigestible
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In a message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2002 1:40:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
> I thought that your being the most formally dressed person in the group lent
> a certain "gravitas" to your comments. I was very disappointed that they
> didn't put up a screen shot of you and Mrs. Ralph with all
> the little
> Ralphs.
Ahhhhh, Lisa,
You are most perceptive and wise despite your tender years.
I am confident the little Ralphs were not happy to remain unshown, and are much more interesting to look at than all those singletons, and at least 50% more interesting than the twins in the bathtub. The GMA bastards are still (8 hours later!) holding our pix hostage.
The suit may have lent me gravitas, but between gross tonnage and advanced chronological resources (we were the geezers in the group, in case you didn't notice), I figured I had gravitas of my own.
Was also VERY relieved to see that I don't have a bald spot, and noted upon close examination that I gave an unintentional Pinhead Salute after all, which to the unititated might look like I was scratching my nose (I had thought about using that as a ruse, and it must have penetrated my black hole of a subconscious after all). But youse guys know better.
Your favorite star,
Ralph
--PAA26889.1029873549/imo-r03.mx.aol.com--