I have been having some difficulty with a couple of our technical guys for some time around the issue of accessibility on our web site. I am hoping some of you can help me with a problem that erupted in the last week related to this. I need to track down a reference or two to back up my stance on an issue. The top page of our web site does has a link to a "text only version" of just our top level pages (that's the good news). However, if someone choose to visit our site via the main "regular" page, not via the text only version, they are likely to encounter a problem, because the main body of the top page is graphical, which means the main navigation links are graphical. I discovered last week while testing out the "wemedia" screen reader, that if someone opted to "view" our main page rather than going to the text only version, they would not even hear that those graphic-based navigation links are even there, which means they wouldn't get to our second level (main pages)! I forward this observation to these guys, and one of them has basically launched a frontal attack around it, even though I offered a very simple solution - just add the text based navigation to the top page that we have on all of our inner pages. I know I have read in several places a description of the problem and recommendations about what to do if someone uses graphic-based navigation on web pages. Do any of you know any references for that information? Where it can be found on-line, so that I can simply refer my colleagues to it? That way they can't attack me. If someone else says it and it's in writing, it takes me out of the equation. Any assistance you can provide would be so very appreciated. Tx. Jeannie [log in to unmask] http://www.wcupa.edu