>Okay. You said about eating fish: >>I'll take your word for it. I seem to be thinking clearly without it, so >>may be an individual thing, or some other unknown factor. > >I pointed out that you seem to be thinking clearly without fish but >you don't know how much you would improve your thinking if you added >fish to your diet. I was just joking, pretending to not be clear headed. I understand what you were saying. > >>Don't you think it's difficult to eat raw fish as a human? > >Think? I just do it. If my body needs it, it tastes very good. The >japanese do it frequently. Where's the problem? What I meant was - not you, but when proto-humans ate fish - presumably with primitive tools, how easy and efficient would that have been to acquire and eat (scales, bones, etc)? Or is this not relevant to you? >but still having minor problems because of a mercury intoxification >four years ago. So I still have one or two colds per year and some- >times low energy. >My nutrition follows the ideas of instinctive nutrition which in- >clude raw animal foods. > Interesting. I wonder if it's the mercury. I have mercury in my dental fillings that may be affecting me, but I haven't been ill since becoming a raw food eater (2 years - amazing) and have great energy. What other foods do your instincts move you to eat? All raw? Do you find that you digest raw meat well?