Stefan: >Well yes. So far I know only one little boy whom I see frequently. >After three years where mainly the mother cared for him he became a >terrible demanding child which always expected every wish of him to >fulfill. He couldn't tolerate if something went in another direction. >Shortly after the father engaged more, this ugly phenomen was gone. >Healthwise he seems to do very well - no doctor seen up to now. And >he now is around 3.5 years old. Jaloa (2.5 and speaking some non-english language) lays a "rasberry" on me whenever she doesn't like what I have to say. I think she picked it up from "All in the Family" reruns on Nick-at-night. Though I suspect this may not be understandable to a European. ;) >>It may comfort you to know that if I do run into any health problems I >>would return to instincto as a matter of course--kind of the first thing >to >>try, eh? > >Yes, if something went wrong I first would let go little enhance- >ments of my own, like eating three proteins in the evening. Just retur- >ning to the roots. Three proteins? Sounds fun. Details? ;) >>Previously, I was, for some reason, interested in being as "pure" >>as possible--presently, I am more interested in seeing what I can get away >>with.;) > >Being pure has never been my interest, but being healthy was and is! Very similar methinks. >>Life is grand. I wish I could have several lifetimes! > >Man, you have! Read "conversations with god" by Neale D. Walsch. It's >all explained there. I will hopefully sprout some mushrooms on me when I die, regardless of how attractive it might be to my ego to think otherwise. ;) But I'm talking out of school since I haven't read your recommended book. :/ >>And also to make up for my own >>overboard "instincto is everything" message in the past. > >Come up, the past is the past. You are living here and now. No compen- >sation necessary. OK. Then I'll just do it for fun. ;) >>Further, I find that much of my historic >>overenthusiasm for instincto was subject to a simple mechanism: I would >>feel less alienated (and distrustful of the world) if I could get other >>people to 1] see how great it is and do it, and 2] see how cool I >>supposedly was for doing it. > >Ah well, here come again the social reasons. There was a time when I >felt alienated to the cooked world. This is over. I just feel being a >part of this big game and if others eat in another way it's just their >way of living. It's not my way any longer but maybe for them it's >helpful. You're simply a mutant. ;) >>jean-claude appears to hate the world in many >>ways--kind of the fruitarian rap only worse because he feels so superior >to >>it. > >We are having different impressions here. Fair enough. >>he is simply prostelytising for instincto--regardless that he >>continues to have his old health problems and apparently some new ones as >>well. But on and on the triumphant talk marches on several lists. > >Hm, let's approach this again from the practical side like I always do: >Have you got any hints for him to get rid of his remaining ailments? He should live in an alternate Walsh universe. ;) >>Calling his bluff doesn't work--apparently he has a pretty air-tight >>defense built up with all his ideas. > >The instincto idea has its air-tight defense ready, I have to admit. >If it can't be blamed to buying bad commercial quality or not obeying >to the food combination rules, it finally is attributed to your ancestors >with their terribly unhealthy living style which let them degenerate. >Well, degeneration is a fact (pottengers cats) but to blame everything >to the above three reasons is obviously too much. Pottinger's Cats may not be much of a fact, but I hear you. >>So, how about it, Stefan. How about some Euro-gossip on the instinctos you >>run with and/or have heard about. Good, bad, ugly. Let's hear some new >>stuff. ;) > >I will try my best. I am waiting with baited breath. ;) Cheers, Kirt Secola /\ Nieft [log in to unmask]