BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range.
Date:
Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:56:00 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
In a message dated 97-12-14 22:58:33 EST, [log in to unmask]
writes:

> I think, rather, that there is a profound shying away from reflectiveness.
Talk
>  about the meaning of what we are doing, in general or in the particular,
>  in a political or philosophical context? Better not.

I get the idea that reflective discussion causes people, in general, to feel
insecure. Part of reflection, and humour, is that you get to a point where you
don't really feel you have to prove something to other people. I've been told
this is the point of FLOW - meaning, now you really know what you are doing
and can freely go about it without too much inhibition. Once you start
broaching the "meaning" of preservation a lot of people may feel they have to
defend their career identities. Unfortunate for me, I thrive on the reflective
process.

Then again, without refraction we have no rainbows and thereby blind ourselves
to the covenant of sharing. But if you are in the business of abating dove
guano, what cares? A little dietary supplement goes a long ways.

Please reflect more.

][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2