I agree w/ Jack, but Mr. McLoughlin should have refrained from his comment
without any evidence. It's these types of remarks that make those with
information reluctant to acknowledge they have it, let alone attempt to share it
with those whom it means anything to.

Jason K

Jack Morris wrote:

> Michael,
>
> Truly, Jeremy should have identified who spoke
> and other detail.  But . . . I believe he sent this
> out to be a pointer and not the entire data bank
> he likely has on hand.  I appreciate the work he
> continues to do and encourage him forward.
> A tad more detail would indeed be appreciated,
> however.
>
> Jack Morris
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.thepalmerpress.com/welcome.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "M McLoughlin" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:55 AM
> Subject: Re: My Sources on the USS Liberty
>
> > Audio briefing?  "Listened to" by a Mr. Chuck Missler? Without the name of
> the speaker or supporting documentation?  With the
> > claim that the USS Liberty was sending intercept data, unencrypted? This
> is evidence? This is a source?  Mr. Compton, you really
> > should be ashamed. Michael McLoughlin