RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wes Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:43:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I wrote:
>> So, as you can see, the supposedly "less altered" bananas actually contain
>> significantly less fiber, and more sugar, than the "more altered"

Kirt responded:
>You are the only one assuming bananas are less altered than other fruits.

Incorrect. I'll re-quote what Gary originally said. And I did not mean that
I was assuming anything. I was speaking hypothetically.

Gary wrote:
>Does anyone know what fruits that are commonly available to the consumer
>are closer to wild state with respect to sugar/fiber ratio and other
>relevant parameters?
>I would think: some berries, longan, lychees, durian, jakfruit, coconut,
>olives, bananas, papaya, in other words, most tropicals. Or are tropicals
>just as altered as apples and citrus?

Wes

ATOM RSS1 RSS2