RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anwar J Goins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:08:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
I don't. Explain how I don't. I know enough to understand this.
But thank you for telling me what I don't know. Nice attempt at shutting
me down, science dictator.

Godbless,
Anwar


Gary Orlando wrote:
>
> >Thanks for that.
>
> you're welcome.
>
> > I don't deny evolution because of a creationist belief,
> because evolution still does not deny God.
>
> a quick reality check denies God.
>
> >However, I think it falls
> short indeed and should not be called a fact.
>
> I don't care whether it's called a fact or not.
>
> >There are faults with it
> which includes the genetic info. problem at the core.
>
> There are faults with all theories that attempt to explain complex natural
> phenomena.
>
> > There is NO KNOWN
> PROCESS WHICH ADDS NEW INFO TO THE GENETIC CODE. Genetic changes can only
> be blamed on chemical or nuclear influences which are only known to
> damage the genetic code.
>
> you do not understand genetics.
>
> >This is why i say that the explanation of
> variation within species is a better explanation because species evolving
> into other species is NOT a fact, it is an unproven hypothesis with some
> definite holes in it.
>
> Only because you refuse to review the evidence.
>
> > And for something to be proven it can't have such holes in it.
>
> you wouldn't say that if you did not believe in God.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2