Peter:
>But, when it comes to meat it is not clear to me that there is an
>significant advantage eating it cooked over eating it raw.

For me it is. Given the fact, that all animals were wild in paleolithic
times, their muscle meat was containing very little fat. Paleolithic
hunter-gatherers went for the fatty parts of the animal. I think, that
an ancient instinctive eater must have gotten a hard stop on the muscle
meat. So the only chance to use it for nutrition would have been light
cooking (in times of scarcity of course).

Best uncooked regards,

Stefan
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]