>Having said that, it's shocking to me that people are designing their
eating
>lives around 70-year old, nonreproducible science.  The leucocytosis study
>would appear to be trivial to try to redo.  But more to the point, white
>blood cell count is an extremely crude biomarker.  Biochemistry has
advanced
>incredibly in the last 70 years.  To gamble one's health on such poor
>science seems unwise to me.

so what those 70 years gave us , as informations about the difference
, in
nature and effects,  between cooked and raw foods?
jean-claude