RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Blake Graham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 22:12:30 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Not that I think the beef board is a very reliable source of info, but check
out what they have to say on Robbin's health claims:

http://www.beef.org/library/myths_facts/dietam10.html
http://www.beef.org/library/myths_facts/dietam11.html

Blake

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Graham" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: Diet For a New America


> So does sci-veg no loner exist???
>
> Blake
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Orlando" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Diet For a New America
>
>
> > http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?A2=ind9902&L=raw-food&P=R20517
> >
> > http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?A2=ind9912&L=raw-food&P=R77
> >
> > try these jo...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jo Yoshida <[log in to unmask]>@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> on
> > 11/07/2001 08:12:42 PM
> >
> > Please respond to Raw Food Diet Support List
> >       <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > Sent by:  Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> >
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Diet For a New America
> >
> >
> > Recently I gave away my copy of John Robbin's Diet For A New America.
> > I recall reading somewhere, maybe it was at the BeyondVeg site, that
> > the author's contentions about the economical or ecological
> > ramifications of a meat-eating diet were based on misinterpreted data
> > (or something to that effect). Does anyone know what these
> > questionable arguments were or links to reviews that might highlight
> > these issues? THX, Jo
> > --
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2