>F : Yes, of course particles do not communicate in English. But, if I
>understand well, we have to admit either that an "instantaneous" signal
>(faster than light) somehow connects them, or else that they are still one
>when far apart (non-separable localy).

Yes, the common interpretation is that there are "non local" phenomena. But
that's not the same thing as sending a "message" instantaneously.


>F : I welcome any rationnal explanation of telepathy and other ESP
>phenomenons.
>Bell's views and experiments about the EPR paradox may well not be the
>proper explanation.

The EPR paradox and subsequent experiments CANNOT AT ALL explain telepathy,
if by telepathy you mean being able to read thoughts (expressed in English,
for instance) in someone else's mind. I am not saying that these phenomena
do not exist (although I doubt so), but that so far, modern physics, quantum
or otherwise, cannot explanation to telepathy.