> So it becomes "a priori"--an obvious given which is beyond real scrutiny.
> Dangerous stuff ;)

That's right. :-)

> To be sure that 100% raw made the difference I thought. So far I'd say I
> found that it doesn't. Raw is important but I think that instincto may have
> reached a bit too far back into prehistory to glean its ideals. But to each
> his own, eh?

Sure, and it is always good to experiment, I think.

-Karl