Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: installing XP/ NTFS vs FAT32
From:	Fred Nielson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 25 Dec 2001 17:19:22 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (45 lines)

Check out the link below for a reasonably in-depth but understandable
comparison.  I found this by searching Google for "NTFS vs FAT32".  Many
other links were also presented.

http://faq.arstechnica.com/link.php?i=1227

Fred Nielson

-----Original Message-----
From: PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jagpal S.Tiwana
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 7:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCSOFT] installing XP/ NTFS vs FAT32


 > What are the nice features!?> > Any drawbacks?>
 > Rob
Rob asked this, but did not get a satisfactory reply.
I m also interested in this.
Why one should prefer NTFS over FAT32,
could somebody please elaborate

With warm  regards,



Jagpal S.Tiwana

http://home.istar.ca/~cye/mss.html





.

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                    http://freepctech.com/staff.shtml

             Do you want to signoff PCSOFT or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                   http://freepctech.com/pcsoft.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG