Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCSOFT - PC software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:58:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [PCSOFT] What about Windows Outlook 98?


>I'm using it (you're looking at the result).  I shifted from my tried and
>true UNIX email program to Outlook 98 and I wouldn't change back.  It
>strikes me as a combination of Outlook Express and Outlook 97, with the
good
>parts of each.  It's not a slow resource hog like Outlook 97, and it's got
>way more features than Outlook Express.
>
>It also works quite nicely on a fairly slow P150 that I use for Internet
>stuff, so I'm happy.

So far I've been quite happy with Outlook Express.  I use the program
strictly for email.  I use the filters and the HTML capability.  So my
question is: is there an overriding reason why I should upgrade to Outlook
98? Can someone here give me a specific reason why I would be much better
off with this upgrade?  Otherwise, I don't think I'll bother with the three
hour download.

- Jack Petrilli

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV