Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: installing XP
From:	Reuven <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:06:11 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (33 lines)

My personal feeling is go with FAT32. My Windows XP crushed some time
ago. The Dell technical support couldn't do a thing, because when he
asked me to boot from a diskette, it was the Win 98 kernel that loaded,
and it couldn't read drive C at all. I had to reinstall Windows XP again
from scratch. 
Also FAT32 seems to be faster. If you are the only one using this
computer, or the security is not an issue, then NTFS has very little
advantage. 

Reuven Freuman <[log in to unmask]>

> 2. If I have a choice to install NTFS or FAT32, which one should I   prefer.
> I hv 1.1 GB processor with 256 MB RAM
> 
> pl advise, Thank you again
> Jagpal S.Tiwana
> 
> http://home.istar.ca/~cye/mss.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ..
> 
>                          PCSOFT's List Owner's:
>                       Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
>                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

                         PCSOFT's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG