Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
Max Timchenko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:20:22 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Hello Jim,

continuing this interesting discussion, here's the comments:

JM> And that's why I've been asking Kevin to supply some URLs so I/we can see
JM> what areal world GoLive page looks like.   It is like the old saying that "a
JM> picture is worth a thousand words"  I can read all day but seeing the
JM> finished product is much more enlightening. <grin>

If GoLive! is of any good, you will not be able to distinguish between
pages made with it from made with Notepad - I mean professional work.
The editor must be unobtrusive. If the designer is forced to change
something because editor does not allows him to do so (as Netscape
Composer, for example, with some table constructions and his urge to
insert &nbsp everywhere), it is time to waste the editor - as you say,
"Hello uninstaller, bye editor". Consequently, all those "Anyone can
make his home page in 10 minutes!" editors can be recognized by a
glance, because they offer a rigid template. A _good_ editor can not
be recognized. Only by directly studying the code, the editor
sometimes can be identified (if GENERATOR and FORMATTER meta tags were
removed).

The conclusion : if you can identify pages made with GoLive! at a
glance, steer clear.

JM> There were many different blank gifs used.  IMG SRC tags used names
JM> beginning with blank1.gif all the way up to blank33.gif.  Which is why I
JM> assumed that it created many different sized images.  I tried viewing
JM> several of those gif files to see what was different, but it is hard to see
JM> a file that is a ....... blank...... gif. <grin>

It is a variation of the better method when only one 1x1 GIF
is used and his dimensions are set by HEIGHT and WIDTH tags (and
browser resizes the GIF accordingly).

+=-.
| Max Timchenko [MaxVT]
| [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
| (ICQ) 238-6792
|
| Freelance website and graphics designer
| Max Webdesign at http://maxwd.hypermart.net
|
| Editor - Graphics artist
| NOSPIN group
+=-.

             Do you want to signoff PCSOFT or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                    http://nospin.com/pc/pcsoft.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV