Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: windows 2000
From:	John Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:12:01 -0800
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (21 lines)

I use Win2k on my 266 laptop w/144MB RAM and love it. It's more robust, but
also more complex than 98. It helps if you are familiar w/NT. The added
security features are a must for me. Otherwise stick w/98 if you want less
system overhead. I've run Win2k on a 200mmx w/64 RAM and it was fine, but
significantly slower than 98.

John

> What do you think of Windows 2000? Someone told me it is better than 98,
with
> much less crashes. Has anyone gone to 2000? I would appreciate hearing
from
> you with an opinion.
> thanks,
> dolores dewbury
> [log in to unmask]

             Do you want to signoff PCSOFT or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                   http://freepctech.com/pcsoft.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG