Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
David Grossman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:39:22 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Hi, Peter,

That is precisely what groups such as Yahoogroups, Googlegroups, Topica,
Smartgroups, and others were set up to accomplish.
Yes, people criticize their service, but the fact is that they do a FAR
better job of handling distribution lists than Outlook or any e-mail client.

David Grossman


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Shkabara" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:23 AM
Subject: [PCSOFT] e-mail distribution list


> I use Outlook 2003 and know how to create a distribution list. The problem
I
> am running into is that I want the mail to be sent to all individuals as
BCC
> so that all of the e-mail addresses don't show up on the recipient's "To"
> line. A way to do this is to place the group in the BCC field, but then
> there needs to be a recipient in the To line.
>
> To avoid having a particular individual listed in the To field, I tried
> creating a dummy contact, say "Parish Members", but if I don't add an
e-mail
> address, Outlook refuses to send the message. If add a real address, then
> Outlook adds that address to the To line in addition to the text that I
want
> to show. Any way to get around this?
>
> I do have a solution - if needed, I can create a real e-mail address
called
> [log in to unmask], but I was wondering if there is another
> solution.
>
> A secondary question. Does anyone have a simple explanation of why
Microsoft
> has an "Address Book" AND a "Contact List" in Outlook? Seems that they do
> the same thing in different ways.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Peter

             Do you want to signoff PCSOFT or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                   http://freepctech.com/pcsoft.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV