Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
Doug Simmons <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:15:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
The reason one virus scanner would find a virus and another wouldn't is
that one that detects, has the virus's signature in its database for
scanning.  That is the major reason for updating your AV virus database
often (I update mine every night).  When a new virus is released, the AV
program providers have to devise the method they are going to use to detect
the virus and add it to a new virus database for downloading.  The on-line
scanners often will find viruses earlier since they are up to date
immediately when a new database is released.

Doug

At 6/15/2004 10:46 PM, Geraldine Jones wrote:

>I ran a scan with AVG and confirmed no viruses found.
>
>I then did one with HouseCall and 3 viruses came up.
>The three were Trojan Stilena.  I was able to delete them
>and I ran another scan and they seemed to be gone, but my
>question is why did AVG not find them and HouseCall did?
>Thank you in advance if anyone can answer my question.

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                    http://freepctech.com/staff.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV