Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: Y2K OS Question
From:	Max Timchenko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 12 Aug 1999 22:15:45 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (37 lines)

Hello Dave,

Thursday, August 12, 1999, 2:25:39 AM, you wrote:

DG> On 8 Aug 99, at 12:58, Lonranger wrote:

>> What I need to know is this:  Is Dos and Windows 3.xx Y2K and will she
>> have any problems getting through to the next year and if so, what could
>> she possibly experience.  She is only doing basic word processing and some
>> surfing.

DG>   Although Microsoft does not claim compliance for DOS and Win 3.x, and will
DG> not be releasing any updates to make them compliant, it is doubtful that date-
DG> based problems will interfere much with "word processing and some surfing".

DOS has the time stored as long word (32 bits) of number of seconds
passed since 00:00, 1.1.1970. This is not affected by 2000 bug. Other
programs might convert this to MM-DD-YY and then it'll be a problem,
but with word-processing and surfing, it shouldn't have a lot of
effect.

If a motherboard is not compliant, a y2k compatibility card could
solve the problem.

+=-.
| Max Timchenko [MaxVT]
| [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
| (ICQ) 238-6792
|
| Freelance website and graphics designer
| Max Webdesign at http://maxwd.hypermart.net
+=-.

                PCSOFT mailing list is brought to you by:
                         The NOSPIN Group, Inc.
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG