PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 22:51:33 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On 25 Dec 99, at 14:30, George W Hurless wrote:

> I have a soc. 7 board
> to 75MHz max. bus
> x to 5.5 max.
> auto detect 3.3/3.5v i/o & 2.8/2.9v i/o
> The max chip (keeping the core & i/o w/in 0.1v is 233MHz.
> My questions are;
> 1) What happens if I go to a chip with i/of  3.3v but core of 2.2v??

  The board is not designed to support this.  It will probably try to
feed the chip about 2.8v.  If that doesn't kill the chip right away,
it will probably at least shorten its lifespan.

> 2) Why have such MHz settings with large multiples if I can't use a
> faster than 233MHz chip??

  233 MHz was the fastest chip around when the board was made.  It
would have been unethical for DFI to claim it would do more than that
when no such faster CPUs were available.

David G

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2