PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Mayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:05:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
It would seems to me that you may  need to go in to the bios and change the
clock settings for your board to allow the CPU to run at full speed.
Consult the documentation for your m/b or go to their website for more
information.


Tony Mayer
Sysop
The Magic FunHouse BBS
http://bbs.magicom.net



>Just tried out a new CPU in my rig - it's an AMD 2500+ with the new 'Barton'
>core - 0.13 micron.
>
>The previous CPU was an AMD 2400+ regular.
>
>Couple of odd results:  First, according to SiSoftSandra, the 2500+ has a
>'true' speed of 1.84Mhz, which is slower than the 2400+ at 2.0Mhz.
>
>So I ran the SiSoftSandra CPU test and got 5032 Dhrystones and 2525
>Whetstones for the 2500+, while the 'slower' 2400+ clocked up 5540 and 2730.
>
>By this time I was planning to return the 2500+ to the wholesaler.
>
>So to cross-check, I ran 3DMark 2001.  Another oddity - my previous mark
>with the old 2400+ had been 11223, but with the new 2500+ it shot up to
>11,769.
>
>Anyone able to comment on these apparent anomalies?
>
>Ian Porter
>Computer Guys Inc.
>Arrowtown
>New Zealand
>[log in to unmask]

            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                   http://freepctech.com/pcbuild.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2