PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Max Timchenko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Aug 1999 20:05:25 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hello Art,

Tuesday, August 10, 1999, 6:55:36 AM, you wrote:

AC> Hi,

AC> It is well "known" on overclocking circles that Maxtor and Fujitsu HD's
AC> are no good for overclocked computers and IBM and WD's are good.  I
AC> can't for the life of me understand what effect the FSB speed would have
AC> on a hard drive.  Why would the hard drive care if the system were
AC> running at 66, 100, 133 or 153 MHz?  Are any of the connectors on the
AC> cable connected to the FSB and if not, why would it be bothered by it?

To pinpoint, you are listing wrong speeds. You are listing FSB speeds
while you should be listing PCI bus speeds :
FSB/PCI
66/33 (1/2)
100/33 (1/3)
112/34 (1/3)
75/37 (1/2)
83/42 (1/2)
133/41 (1/3)

as you see, the speed of the PCI bus grows, and the time between PCI
bus "clocks" shortens. This might be enough for something to take too
long - for example, slow buffer memory in HD will not work fast enough
to fit into one PCI bus cycle.

Sometimes by lowering the PIO level of the drive you can fix the
errors, but this will slow the data transfer HD<->PC as well.

+=-.
| Max Timchenko [MaxVT]
| [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
| (ICQ) 238-6792
|
| Freelance website and graphics designer
| Max Webdesign at http://maxwd.hypermart.net
+=-.

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2