PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carroll Grigsby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:16:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Petrus:
The details about the KM133 chip are available at:
www.viatech.com/jsp/en/products/prosavage/km133.jsp
The KM133 chip is based on the KT133A chip, but includes 10/100 BaseT,
audio, modem and video. A PC using this chip should be less expensive
since it does not require the extra cards or wiring, but it may be
difficult to expand or modify the system if that should be necessary at
some time in the future. The target market is probably the corporate
world, where cost and minimal size are usually more important than
flexibility.
Regards,
Carroll Grigsby

Petrus Naryana wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
> I'm considering to build an AMD-based PC, utilizing my PC133 SDRAMs and
> ATA100 7200RPM HDD. I didn't follow the development or progress of VIA for
> AMD though, since my systems were mostly Intel systems.
> Now, browsing the market prices, there are significant cost difference if I
> take motherboard that is based on KM133 despite of the highly recommended
> KT133A. What are actually the differences between KT133A and KM133? I'll use
> the PC  for regular home office usage, i.e.: basic multimedia is enough.
> Appreciate if you can enlighten me on this matter. Thank you.

                         PCBUILD's List Owners:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2