> At 15:19 8/14/1999 , Drew Dunn wrote:
>  >The most significant difference between a PII and a Celeron is that the
>  >level 2 cache on a PII is four times larger than that of a Celeron, so
>  >at a given clock speed a PII will outperform a Celeron on CPU intensive
>  >operations.
>
> But there's another difference! The cache in the PII runs at half
> the CPU's clock speed whereas the cache in the Celeron runs at the
> full speed of the CPU. The Celeron has faster cache!

OK, now here is another question. All that being said about caches and
speeds, what is the performance difference between say, a PII or III at the
same speed as a Celeron, say both in the 400 or 450 range, with the
difference being the 100Mhz FSB vs. 66FSB? Does the FSB speed effect the
performance or are all things equal more or less still?
Reason for the question is, I am about to upgrade my PII233 to probably a
PIII450. From what you two are saying it sounds like I'd get about the same
performance out of a Celeron 466 or 500 with an adapter in my Abit BX6, but
with out the new instructions.  Is this the gist of this? Since a Celeron is
just a bit cheaper than a PIII 450. Just trying to get educated. Thanks.

Brad Loomis
Los Angeles, CA

                  Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
               articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org