PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:53:34 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Hi, am I understanding this correctly?
Usb 2.0 and Usb 1.1 are basically the same, exept Usb 2.0 is faster?
Will a Usb2.0 device work with a standard usb port then?
(Even if at a slower rate?)
I understand the logic in that  you can't make the standard usb port work
any faster than it was designed to do, but am I right in thinking you can
chop and change? (even if the usb2.0 device  ends up slower than it should
be?)
As I am currently running win98, I have not used usb 2.0 as yet (as far as I
am aware).
(Excuse me if this question has already been asked, I must have missed it)
Michele Sayer

                         PCBUILD's List Owners:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2