Depending on the job, the 2.4 Celeron might be a bit faster then the 1.3
Celeron M, but not that I think you will notice on a laptop. The Intel M =
mobile line runs a lot cooler, has a bigger cache, and runs a lot longer
from battery power. IMO A Dell Latitude (the corporate laptop product) is a
far superior machine to a COMPAQ , in fact, to any laptop except a Think
pad or an Apple Powerbook.

In either case, I would up the ram to 512MB for a quicker, smoother machine.

Rode
The NOSPIN Group
http://www.freepctech.com/rode/


At 10:19 AM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
>As a result of no stock for warranty my provider is proposing  one
>       Latitude 110L, Celeron M 350 (1.30GHz), 15.0 XGA, English (221-7534)
>      256MB integrated DDR SDRAM 1 DIMM,
>30GB Hard Drive 9.5MM, 4200RPMfor
>No Floppy Drive for Latitude D-Family Notebooks (340-8854)
>24X fixed CDRW/DVD for Latitude 110L, Factory Install (313-3175)
>Dell Wireless 1350 WLAN (802.11b/g,54Mbps) miniPCI Card,
>Cell Lithium Ion Primary Battery, Latitude 110L Factory Installed (312-0319)
>
>In place of  one
>DM745A-R REFURB COMPAQ PRESARIO 2190US / 2.4 GHZ - CELERON /256 MB RAM /
>40 GB HDD / CDRW - DVD COM
>Appart from the Wlan and the HDD´the only performance potential difference
>I see is the CPU, however I dont quite understand which of then would be
>better ; the Celeron 2.4 GHZ or the Celeron M 350.
>The intel site did not put too much light on the matter.
>Any comments?
>TIA

              The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
                     support at our newest website:
                          http://freepctech.com