PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ian C." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 16:27:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I currently have a CDROM and master on the secondary channel, with an Acer
burner as slave on same channel (per Acer's instructions).  This arrangement
works perfectly (ooops, wrong word for a wintel system) okay for me.

> >
> I >
> While researching the issues surrounding CD re-writable technology an old
> archived PC-Build post led me to an article that claimed the following:
>
> > To minimize the possibility of buffer underruns, you should not connect
the
> recorder to the same IDE-channel as your intended source; IDE is
> notoriously poor at multitasking on a single channel. Usually, the hard
> disk is connected to the primary IDE channel and the CD-ROM drive is
hooked
> to the secondary IDE channel.
>
> My questions are these.
>
> Given my Abit BH6 motherboard has 2 EIDE controllers on-board, I need to
> use all available positions with 2 Hard Drives, and both the CD-ROM and
> CD/RW.  On which channels should I position each drive to address a
primary
> concern of reliability and a secondary concern of speed?
>


Ian Carmichael

               PCBUILD mailing list is brought to you by:
                            The NOSPIN Group
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2