PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ubiratan C. Peleteiro" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 15:38:30 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Philippe Beaulieu wrote:
>
> In a message dated 98-07-16 01:29:22 EDT, you write:
>
> << John Rinehart <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>  >From what I have read, the 'newer' EDO memory is backward
>  >compatible with the 'older' FPM memory.
>  >John
>       I have not heard that, just the opposite.  I tried it on my 486
>  following
>  the chip placement requirements and ignoring the fact it was EDO ---  It
>  did not work. But then again, I did not "expect it" to...
>       The EDO chips were "known good" and are still in use in the "proper"
>  type of motherboard.
>       Rick Glazier
>   >>
> THIS  next passage is directly from the handbook to my motyerboard::::""use 5v
> EDO or FPM SIMM MODULES
> any combination of specified modules allowed
> f w i w
> philippe j beaulieu
> [log in to unmask]

Tell us the model of your MotherBoard. I never saw a MB with this
caracteristic.

Ubiratan.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2