Not to be argumentative, but I've had more stability with Win98-SE.  I know
you qualified your statement as to reliability w/ W95II, but I think we all
have to realize that each of us may experience the different "faces" of
Windows.

And- a question I've been wanting to ask-- what does "TTYL" mean? :)

Regards,

Jerry

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herbert Graf" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2000 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Operating Systems


> >    First I would question why you want to go back to 95? If your RAM is
> > small (16 MB) or processor is slow (486 machine) then maybe you would
> > want to go back to 95. But otherwise, 98 is a much superior OS for PCs
> > that can handle it.
>
>         Actually I would have to disagree on this, by far the most stable
version
> of win9x has been win95B (or C they are almost the same), at least for me.
> Unless you need USB (or any of the other features that win98 offers) I
> recommend to most people that they stick with win95B. Win98 is just too
> bloated, alot of stuff is in it that people never use (heck alot of stuff
is
> in win95 that people rarely use too). Just my opinion, but I am sticking
> with win95B, well, and Linux! :) TTYL
>
>          The NOSPIN Group Promotions is now offering the NOSPIN
>         File Download CD... All the files from our File Download
>          area and much more...  over 165 files, all on one CD!!
>                       http://nospin.com/promotions

               PCBUILD mailing list is brought to you by:
                            The NOSPIN Group
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org