PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carl Houseman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:54:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I'm sure MS limited the FAT support of the built-in tools to 32GB simply to
discourage the use of FAT for "anything serious".

MS VPC is just wonderful.  Need to have enough RAM available to support both
OS's at once is the only caveat I've seen so far.
(talked about RAM so that made this a hardware discussion :-).

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Glazier
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] New hard drive

While this is true for the built-in tools, you "can" use third party
tools (or older MS ones?) to make a larger partition and it will
work fine.  I never trusted that theory myself since I would rather
have the security and convenience (and journaling) of NTFS.

(If I wanted to run Win98, I'd do it in a MSVirtualPC2004 session
on a NTFS drive inside a virtual drive file...)

                                              Rick Glazier

From: "Carl Houseman" <[log in to unmask]>

> BTW, if you want to have access to the Win2K partition from Win98, you
will
> have to format with the FAT(32) file system.   And in Win2K and XP, a FAT
> volume is limited to 32GB.

                         PCBUILD's List Owners:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2