PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Twin*.*Star" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Mar 1999 23:08:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
When you been intimate with puters as long as me...recent can easily be 10
years. Remember I was basing it on probability (have not been to Vegas
"recently"...it has been well over 10 years) since I said I was not familiar
with that particular mobo.

WRT PII or PIII, again, it is not CPU related but mobo (or as you so
eloquently implied, chipset and tag RAM). But then again with this aging
mind, I could be inaccurate. And as always, will check my sources to verify.
(Hey, Bruno, check the dealer on #12 table, I have a puter question.)

Daniel Wysocki
Twin*.*Star Computers
770-498-2582 /800-816-0663
[log in to unmask]
Fast - Reliable - Wallet Friendly


-----Original Message-----
From: James Maki <[log in to unmask]>


I object to your use of the word "recent" in the paragraph
below. :-)  I have a FIC PA-2007 (which is no longer
made) that I purchased in October of 1997. It cached
greater than 64 MB without a problem! It depends on the
chipset and cache size (the PA 2007 had 1 MB cache
and used a VIA chipset). The old TX chipset did have this
limitation.

I have not yet entered the realm of Pentium II and III
computers/MBs, but I am fairly sure they are NOT limited
to caching 64 MB of RAM.

            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                    http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2