PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George W Hurless <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:46:24 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Thanks for the verification Dave. I'll live with the 233Mhz chip, until I
can upgrade board and all.
Geo.


> > 1) What happens if I go to a chip with i/o of  3.3v but core of
> 2.2v??
>
>   The board is not designed to support this.  It will probably try
> to
> feed the chip about 2.8v.  If that doesn't kill the chip right away,
> it will probably at least shorten its lifespan.
>
> > 2) Why have such MHz settings with large multiples if I can't use
> a
> > faster than 233MHz chip??
>
>   233 MHz was the fastest chip around when the board was made.  It
> would have been unethical for DFI to claim it would do more than
> that
> when no such faster CPUs were available.
>
> David G
>

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2